Thursday, July 07, 2005
It's sad when Republicans attack Republicans ... but I can understand why some don't like what the state party is forced to stand for (thus the starting of the "Mainstream South Dakota Coalition"... and not just the "Activist judge," "Anti-Abortion," "Pro-Lynching" and "Anti-Gay" bumper sticker things ...
But for not adequately armoring vehicles in Iraq ... a lower Stock Market, a stagnant economy ... approval of torture ... unprotected borders ... 10 trillion dollar deficit, 40 million uninsured ... not having the head of Osama ... giving terrorists reasons not to fear the US ... or the citizens of the world to respect us ... high gas prices ... allowing financial aid to decrease and tuition to increase ... being against helping Africa "as fast" as other countries ...
The critics of the Moderate Coalition (of the willing) slam it for not holding firm to the Republican Party Platform ... but isn't a willingness to compromise with Democrats in the name of progress to actually get common goals and legislation passed something to praise rather than criticize?
But for not adequately armoring vehicles in Iraq ... a lower Stock Market, a stagnant economy ... approval of torture ... unprotected borders ... 10 trillion dollar deficit, 40 million uninsured ... not having the head of Osama ... giving terrorists reasons not to fear the US ... or the citizens of the world to respect us ... high gas prices ... allowing financial aid to decrease and tuition to increase ... being against helping Africa "as fast" as other countries ...
The critics of the Moderate Coalition (of the willing) slam it for not holding firm to the Republican Party Platform ... but isn't a willingness to compromise with Democrats in the name of progress to actually get common goals and legislation passed something to praise rather than criticize?
Comments:
Post a Comment
